Understanding Competition, Choice and Oversight in the Proposed Transcontinental Connection
Download PDFDoes the Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern ConnectionReduce Competition?
What We Are Proposing
How the Proposal Affects Rail to Rail Competition
- End to end structure: The transaction is proposed as an end-to-endcombination and is not designed to eliminate an existing rail-to-rail competitor inmost markets.
- Existing options maintained: Other Class I railroads are expected to continue serving their current markets through established interchange points, subject to STB review and any conditions the Board may impose, so customer choices available today are expected to remain available after closing.
- New single line option: The combined network would create an additional single line routing option in key West Coast–Midwest–Southeast corridors where shippers today often rely on multiple carriers and handoffs.
- Potential efficiency gains: Reducing interchanges between carriers can improve network efficiency and service reliability for long distance freight movements, which the STB will consider as part of its public interest review.
Frequently Asked Questions
Some stakeholders have expressed concern that the combined connection could reduce competition or lead to monopoly concerns in certain markets. Based on today’s network footprints, UP and NS have limited overlapping routes, so the transaction is not intended to reduce rail to rail competition in most lanes. The STB will independently test that conclusion and can impose conditionsor remedies if needed.
The proposal is intended to maintain current carrier options while adding a new single line routing alternative for certain long haul freight movements. As part of its competitive analysis, the STB will evaluate how the transaction could affect shipper options in specific corridors and may require measures to protect or enhance customer choice.
Under federal law and STB regulations, major rail combinations must be shown to be consistent with the public interest, which includes a detailed assessment of competition, service, safety and environmental impacts. Applicants must provide full system competitive analyses, and the Board may require conditions that preserve or enhance competition where appropriate.
Potential opportunities include West Coast–Midwest–Southeast freight corridors that currently require multiple interchanges, particularly for intermodal and certain carload traffic. Specific service enhancements, routes and any competitive conditions will be defined through the STB review and authorization process.
More detailed information is outlined in our STB application, available on our STB Hub page.